Please share far and wide!

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Our Toxic Environment, Fake Food, And Chemicals Galore Are Creating A Spike in Cancers and Other Diseases

stock here: I have been meaning to write a fully fleshed out version of this article. It would probably take me days, seeing that my engineering brain has taken over my former writing and language skills.

Lot's Wife sent me this link, and it is nearly perfect. They nail every point that I would nail.

I would do something a bit more though, and maybe I will add those into the text someday with a blue font. Maybe that is good "winter work" and I just added up all the work tasks and projects that I wish to complete before winter, and it's 29.5 days, so I have my work cut out for me. Ouch. What I would add in would be specific strategies for mitigating or counteracting these negative influences.

For instance:

Radionuclides in water: Water softener and RO system. RO can be either whole house or just point of use.

Flourides in water: RO system

Why Are There So Many Cancers Now?

 Catherine Frompovich

By Catherine J Frompovich

This is an “anthology” of sorts about the etiology of the current cancer epidemic-pandemic.
C-A-N-C-E-R is the word that strikes horror in the hearts and minds of every human alive. However, that always was not the case. I’m old enough to remember when cancer was a rather ‘rare’ disease or condition.  Furthermore, I know medical doctors a little older than my ‘vintage’ who say that when they were in medical school, they were not taught very much about cancer, so much so, that when a cancer patient was in one of the wards in a teaching hospital, the entire class of physicians-in-training was trotted in to see that patient. How interesting?

Personally, I’m of the belief that there is not very much new under the sun EXCEPT what’s being designed and created by genetic modification and geoengineering. Cancer, undoubtedly, has been around in some form probably since very ancient times. However, the current ‘plague of cancers’, even though not an anomaly since just about everyone and his or her brother has or had it, became ‘profitable’ during the latter half of the twentieth century.

There is no doubt that cancer, as an ‘industry’, will become even more problematic—plus profitable—to the point where every person probably will contract cancer in some form or other, almost as if by some ulterior design. Why do I say that? Because of how cancer has been made into a “profitable business,” revenue stream and profit center for varied and numerous vested interests, when there actually are cancer cures controlling vested interests suppress or even keep for themselves.  Is that too harsh to hear?  Well, have you recently looked into or checked out the ridiculously-priced costs of cancer treatments and protocols? Like all wars, the “war on cancer” is profitable for vested interests.

For starters, the average cost of a new cancer drug is over $100,000 per year. Newly-approved cancer drugs can cost about $10,000 on average per month, while some can top off at around, or over, $30,000 a month.

Contrast those prices with the cost of cancer drugs a decade or so ago, which were a mere ‘smidgen’ of only $4,500 a month. Talk about inflation, or is it medical-pharma rip-off time? Owning a ‘cancer insurance’ policy really doesn’t help defray many of those costs either. Usually a cancer policy will state that it provides a lump sum payment for “a covered cancer” or a recurrence of cancer. Some policies will provide a lump sum cash payout of X dollars upon diagnosis and that’s it!

This website gives the “average” medical costs for various types of cancers.
What do you think is the average salary an oncologist pulls in? That salary can range from approximately $294,000 to $383,000 per year. However, how do doctors feel about taking chemotherapy for themselves? When polled, the results showed “75% of physicians in the world refuse chemotherapy for themselves”. Isn’t that interesting?

In this article, “If Chemotherapy Fails 97% Of The Time, Why Do Doctors Recommend It?” you may begin to understand that doctors don’t learn to cure anything!  “They learn about chemical intervention or surgery to suppress symptoms. They don’t go for the root cause.” (That would put them out of business!)

So how did allopathic medicine and humans become ‘partners’ in cancer?

The first documented case of cancer comes from ancient Egypt. According to the American Cancer Society, there are eight documented cases of breast cancer found on papyrus dating all the way back to 3000 B.C. Even the term cancer has been around for centuries— Hippocrates, the Greek physician who is widely considered the Father of Medicine, used the words carcinos and carcinoma to describe tumors. [1]
Incidentally, there is no mention of cancer per se, even though other diseases are mentioned, in the Old and New Testaments of the Bible. However, individual interpretations, though, may lead some to conclude differently.

Cancer as a rarity in ancient times is not disputed, although some fossilized bone tumors have been found in ancient human mummies. The dreaded disease of antiquity was leprosy or what’s known in modern times as Hansen’s disease.

During the Renaissance in Europe, a better understanding of the human body began to develop and that led to more diagnostics, especially once post mortem operations (autopsies) became more of a routine procedure after death.  The Renaissance’s Michelangelo, sculptor of “David,” was known to perform detailed anatomical dissections of “fresh cadavers,” which obviously led to his ability to ‘create’ a marble man of extreme anatomical elegance.  Additionally, the invention of the microscope moved pathogenesis along to a great degree of sophisticated knowledge regarding diseased tissues.

It wasn’t until the 1900s that the ‘modern’ or current understanding about cancer and things called “carcinogens” began to appear in science and medicine.   Coincidentally, or more accurately I say, parallel tracks relating to certain diseases began to manifest too.  Those parallels encompassed man-made chemicals and cancer demographics!  Currently the ‘buzz words’ also include epigenetics.

What went wrong?

Some of the most egregious assaults upon the human organism that contribute to cancers are the inordinate use and amounts of toxic chemicals placed into food and water—deliberately!  Food growing, processing, preserving, coloring and taste enhancement-chemicals do not belong in food—period!  They adulterate food and our bodies causing biochemical and nutritional imbalances, including genotoxic DNA problems that program cancers.  Neither do most of the man-made chemicals used in water treatment facilities belong in water—the second-most vital element, besides air, for maintaining life.

In my July 2016 book, Eat to Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities, I devote the Introduction to chronicling how agriculture and the food chain have been polluted chemically, basically since the Industrial Revolution, and especially since World War II when USA businesses and industries went haywire manufacturing, advertising and selling chemicals and pharmaceuticals as ‘needed elements to make life better’—“Better living through chemistry!”  Unfortunately, consumers bought into and ‘embraced’ all the ‘kill’ chemicals for eliminating bugs, vermin, crab grass, weeds, etc.  How hoodwinked were we not to realize that anything that can kill one life form, can and will do irreparable or long-term damage to other life forms higher up the food chain?  Those “can’t do without” lawn chemicals now pollute our drinking water!

In my professional opinion as a retired healthcare professional and consumer health researcher/journalist and author, I feel toxic chemicals that have impacted the human central nervous system (the blood brain barrier being breached, in particular) plus the human immune system quite dramatically are what I’d classify as deliberately deceptive money-making enterprises. In my opinion, one is fluoridation of the water supply and the other is vaccines with all their neurotoxic ingredients.

Fluoride is a protoplasmic poison [2-3-4], which can be involved in the etiology of cancers of the bone (osteosarcoma) and oral cancers.  Fluoride causes genetic damage; 19 major university studies have proven that!  I’ll talk about vaccine chemicals later on.

Furthermore and sticking with toxically-polluted water, underground water aquifers are being poisoned by chemicals used in fracking for the extraction of gas and oil found in shale deposits.  According to the researchers who wrote the paper “Natural Gas Operations from a Public Health Perspective,” there are “71 nasty drilling and fracturing chemicals that result in 10 or more health effects,” which can be found here.

But, I’m getting ahead of myself on the timeline of the cancer epidemic-pandemic.


Radiation and Radioactive particulates

Ever since the Manhattan Project to build and test nuclear weapons began (circa 1942), the human race has been subjected to unnatural levels of ionizing radiation circling the globe and impregnating air, food and water.  Thyroid cancers are a prime indication of that type of exposure.  The Manhattan Project resulted in the detonation of two atomic bombs dropped by the USA in 1945 (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan), which created radiation and radionuclides that affected everything on earth, including cow’s milk and the children who drank the milk!

What type of damage does nuclear radiation do to the body?
Three types of radiation damage may occur: bodily damage (mainly leukemia and cancers of the thyroid, lung, breast, bone, and gastrointestinal tract); genetic damage (birth defects and constitutional and degenerative diseases due to gonodal damage suffered by parents); and development and growth damage (primarily growth and mental retardation of unborn infants and young children). [5]
Probably the most serious threat is cesium-137, a gamma emitter with a half-life of 30 years. It is a major source of radiation in nuclear fallout, and since it parallels potassium chemistry, it is readily taken into the blood of animals and men and may be incorporated into tissue.
Other hazards are strontium-90, an electron emitter with a half-life of 28 years, and iodine-131 with a half-life of only 8 days. Strontium-90 follows calcium chemistry, so that it is readily incorporated into the bones and teeth, particularly of young children who have received milk from cows consuming contaminated forage.

Iodine-131 is a similar threat to infants and children because of its concentration in the thyroid gland.
In addition, there is plutonium-239, frequently used in nuclear explosives. A bone-seeker like strontium-90, it may also become lodged in the lungs, where its intense local radiation can cause cancer or other damage.

Plutonium-239 decays through emission of an alpha particle (helium nucleus) and has a half-life of 24,000 years. To the extent that hydrogen fusion contributes to the explosive force of a weapon, two other radionuclides will be released: tritium (hydrogen-3), an electron emitter with a half-life of 12 years, and carbon-14, an electron emitter with a half-life of 5,730 years. Both are taken up through the food cycle and readily incorporated in organic matter. [5]
Shouldn’t we be asking what’s happening to our air, food and water since Chernobyl (1986) and especially since Fukushima (2011) with its uncontained radioactive leaks into the Pacific Ocean and the atmosphere which global nuclear powers seemingly aren’t willing to help clean up?  Are food crops growing in USA’s western states of Washington, Oregon and California affected—including organically-grown crops?

How about all the atmospheric nuclear testing done by various “nuclear countries” [10 or 11] that have stockpiled nuclear weapons?  What have they put into the atmosphere?  Then there are the depleted uranium ordnances used by the USA in fighting the Gulf War, in Iraq, and possibly Syria.  Children born in Iraq after that outrageous war based upon the false pretense of “weapons of mass destruction that were not there, but the USA obviously has” are suffering the consequences of ionizing radiation and genotoxic chemicals, as told in this video.

Source: https://youtu.be/CYnDw1ReVhw?t=9

Let’s not overlook all the ‘minor’ nuclear power plant ‘uneventful’ leaks and shutdowns because of some sort of technology failures, the foremost being the Three Mile Island ‘accident’ outside Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, March 28, 1979.  Also, do you know that all nuclear power plants are permitted to emit regularly ‘safe’ levels of radioactivity up their stacks [9]?

Weather Geoengineering “Chemtrails”

Let’s not forget the ever-persistent Solar Radiation Management effort to control the weather—pardon my misspeak—to prevent “climate warming”—using toxic chemical sprays that cloud over the skies and produce toxic rain and snow, which pollute everything on earth, including the food we eat and the water we drink, not to mention contaminating our lungs with nanoparticles probably engineered to tag and ‘track’ us or fashion us into radiofrequency ‘radio signal receivers’.  Isn’t the U.S. Air Force gearing up to own the weather as a weapon of war by 2025? [10]
Some of the toxins found in the assays of chemtrail-spiked rain water assayed in California [6] include:
  • Aluminum
  • Arsenic
  • Barium salts
  • Cadmium
  • Desiccated human blood cells
  • Lead
  • Mercury
  • Mycoplasma
  • Polymer fibers
  • Radio cesium
  • Strontium
  • Uranium
  • Plus others
Add to the above as a ‘contraindication’, another ‘parallel’ of sorts, which involves chemtrails apparently contributing to a newly-occurring terrible health syndrome that presents as a crawling sensation under the skin with nanofibers emerging; it’s called Morgellons disease [7-8].

Genetically Modified Organisms: Food, Animals, Plants and Organisms

The high tech world of genetic engineering or modification is so overwhelmingly large, I cannot begin to touch on it in this article which, if I did, could wind up being the size of a book, so I will focus on only genetically modified ‘phood’, which I cover in great detail in my July 2016 book, Eat to Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities.
What I touch on next is miniscule in comparison to the known and published research, science and literature, so I may be criticized for not mentioning problems that some readers think I should have included but, inadvertently, have omitted.  I apologize for that, but I’ve got to make tracks the best I can in tying this article in to the cancer epidemic-pandemic.
Notably since the 1980s (and even earlier) there have been full-bore scientific determinations to design and recreate Nature and most, if not all, of Nature’s attributes into the scientific power-dream of domination, control, skewing and modifying DNA/RNA in just about everything that most humans refer to as “Intelligent Design”-created or  God’s creation.  Genetic modification (GM/GMO/GE) affects just about every facet of most life forms on Planet Earth NOW!
The GMO ‘track’ that has the better potential and most immediately-effective strategy for refashioning human DNA/RNA besides vaccines, in my opinion, is GMO ‘phood’!  That being said, I’d like to refer readers to another of my books, Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick, wherein I discuss in greater depth GMOs.  As a matter of fact, while I was writing that book, I was in email contact with Professor Séralini, PhD, whose subsequent 2 year rat studies on GMO feed has become a landmark study about cancerous tumors from GMO rations and glyphosate.
Dr Séralini’s work [11] puts to rest, and absolutely trashes, Monsanto’s 90-day GMO-‘safety’-studies presented to the FDA for GMO technology approvals [12-13]!
That being said, Monsanto’s GMO crops and the Monsanto GMO agricultural methods for growing those crops – the use of inordinate amounts of glyphosate in Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup® by contract farming or there are legal problems for farmers – leave the planet, its livestock, almost all plant matter, soils/farms, pollinator insects and, especially, humans, who eat GMO ‘phoods’ in dire straits.  Gastrointestinal health problems affecting the human microbiome from glyphosate residues found in most processed food is being documented [16].  Children, who are vaccine damaged, get gastrointestinal relief and find a way to wellness when put on a GMO-free diet [17].
Not only in food is glyphosate found, but in vaccines injected into infants, toddlers, teens, adults and senior citizens!  See my article about that confirmation from the scientific research of Anthony Samsel, PhD.

Glyphosate is a very toxic chemical!

I’d like to thank Chris, who made a comment to my article above and which I want to share, since Chris seems to know more about glyphosate’s interesting ‘past’:
Glyphosate=N-phosphonomethylGLYCINE, contains the amino acid glycine, which also happens to be the human inhibiting neurotransmitter!! Dr. Samsel and Seneff published all the relevant data on that issue, which somehow is not becoming loud enough! Carcinogenicity of glyphosate was known by Monsanto in 1981, and first later the biotech seed producer came to the idea to design new artificial genes, which would bind the carcinogen glyphosate and make ~85% of all GMO’s glyphosate resistant. What goes even further into history, is the fact that glycine supports fast proliferation of certain types of cancer, a fact known in 1932!!! Thus features of the glycine, one of the simplest amino acid on our planet were investigated thoroughly for decades, and once it was known that it participates in cancer growth, glyphosate was ‘discovered’, as the artificial chemical mimick (replacement) of glycine. First it was used as ‘safest’ herbicide, later it became the essence of most GMO’s produced by the biotech ‘seed’ giants. The latest article about glyphosate from Dr. Samsel and Seneff, goes into horrifying theoretical scenario, a production of peptoids, within OUR BODIES! Peptoids are not digestible, but once becoming parts of our bodies, certainly support some artificial unknown function. Not for nothing Dr. Seneff works for the office of ‘artificial intelligence’….
The purpose of Glyphosate was planned not only for decades, but for almost a century by now… Since Glyphosate is deeply connected with almost all GMO’s, the entire biotechnology with its ‘fruits’ HAS TO BE PUT INTO A DEEP INVESTIGATION, A.S.A.P. [CJF emphasis added]
Glyphosate’s ‘history’, as stated above, must be investigated immediately by reputable independent scientists, not Monsanto’s or Bayer’s ‘gophers’!  The U.S. CDC, FDA, USDA, EPA and Congress must become involved immediately, if not sooner, and prevent the ‘marriage’ of the Bayer-Monsanto ‘families’ that probably will facilitate cancer even more than ever as a result of the ‘scientific’ clout Bayer will attain as the largest GMO seed producer in the world.

Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Technologies Contribution to Cancer

In this world of ‘smart’ gadgets and appliances, everyone unknowingly has bought into being irradiated with non-ionizing microwave radiofrequency energies that have been declared a class 2B carcinogen by the IARC of the World Health Organization:
PRESS RELEASE N° 208 31 May 2011
IARC Classifies Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields As Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans
Lyon, France – May 30, 2011  The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based upon an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use. [14]
What most folks PROBABLY aren’t aware of is that all “smart” appliances operate on microwave technology frequencies and fall into the same class 2B above, just not cell phones which are the primary wireless technology in use.  However, others equally as dangerous, if not more so, include:
Wi-Fi in schools, offices and public places; utilities’ AMI Smart Meters; and any device that can send and receive data, voice, photos, messages, etc. using microwave technology!
Currently, there’s talk about Google’s 5G “Wi-Fi in the Sky” Project SkyBender [15]. God help us when that goes into effect!  If you ever thought about wearing a tin-foil-hat, then that would be the time to do so.  Why?  In order to protect your brains from being ‘fried’, I offer, from the research that’s been hidden DELIBERATELY by the microwave tech industry for years indicating non-thermal adverse health effects known as electromagnetic hypersensitivity and as a contributing factor to many types of cancers.
Whatever you do, please do not wear a ‘live’ or active cell phone on your body, e.g., on your belt; in your pants pocket; in your bra; or an ear piece that’s not the proper type to prevent RFs from going directly into your ear and brain.

All the above probably will pale to what I will discuss next, I offer.

Probably a more significant factor for the current cancer epidemic-pandemic is the fact that children in the 1950s through 1963 (or longer, it’s thought) were vaccinated with polio vaccines containing a cancer virus, the SV40 virus.  More than 100 million children received that cancer virus in the polio vaccine!  I discuss that and much more about vaccine ingredients in my book, Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines.

The U.S. Congress held a hearing in 2003 wherein they investigated and had to admit that.  Here’s the report “Preventing Another SV40 Tragedy: Are Today’s Safe Vaccine Protocols Effective?” [No! I offer.] dated November 13, 2003 admitting what happened.  However, here’s what I wrote about that SV40 vaccine problem for VacTruth in 2011.

Nothing speaks more clearly than Dr Maurice Hilleman, the father of modern vaccines who worked for Merck, talking very candidly about those monkeys from whom the SV40 virus was derived.
Source: https://youtu.be/13QiSV_lrDQ?t=24

The long and short of the above vaccine tragedy is that apparently there may be some impact on cancer rates since the SV40 virus has been found in cancerous tumors excised from cancer patients!  This article discusses the “cause and effect” issues revolving around SV40 and cancer.  One can assume that there is ‘no cause and effect’ just like there is ‘no cause and effect’ with the MMR vaccine and Autism due to the CDC’s blatant fraudulent scientific findings as exposed by whistleblower William Thompson, PhD, and told in the documentary movie VAXXE.

You can’t handle the truth about vaccines (Ad)

However, that’s not the first time the CDC had fudged and falsified the connection between vaccines and Autism; there’s the Verstraeten study that was reworked circa 2000.  Attorney Robert F Kennedy, Jr disclosed what’s become known as the “Simpsonwood Meeting” that effectuated the rework of  CDC epidemiologist Verstraeten’s confirmed Autism-from-vaccines  research data that somehow morphed into a newly-generated “no cause and effect to autism from vaccines” study.

Then there is the unfortunate problem of Merck and Company falsifying for ten years the effectiveness rate of the mumps active in their MMR vaccine, which whistleblowers exposed and currently is before the Federal court [18-19] in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

We can’t trust the CDC, FDA or the vaccine makers when it comes to vaccine science!  The CDC is the vaccine makers’ champion for mandatory vaccinations.  Why, when vaccines contain so many neurotoxins and probable carcinogenic ingredients like formaldehyde, and the CDC/FDA should be protecting healthcare consumers, not Big Pharma?

Is the current cancer epidemic-pandemic a ‘man-made’ problem?

As I said in the beginning of this “anthology,” cancer has been around since ‘forever’, but the current rate of contraction is far beyond what could be termed ‘natural chances’.  Everything, including pharmacology, which I’ve not discussed, is implicated in a “cause and effect” with cancer ideologies, especially anything having to do with “man-made” chemicals, a great quantity of which affects our food, water and the air we breathe.

Is it too late to do anything about the cancer epidemic-pandemic What do you think?

References:

[1] http://www.canaryfoundation.org/2012/08/13/how-long-have-we-been-plagued-by-cancer/
[2] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18605366
[3] http://www.fluoridation.com/quotes.htm
[4] http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/fluoride-cancer-osteoporosis.html
[5] http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/Effects/wenw_chp2.shtml
[6] http://stopsprayingcalifornia.com/What_are_they_Spraying.php
[7] http://www.mayoclinic.org/morgellons-disease/art-20044996
[8] http://www.thecehf.org/morgellons-disease-pictures-images.html
[9] http://www.nirs.org/factsheets/routineradioactivereleases.htm
[10] http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf
[11] http://www.gmoseralini.org/republication-seralini-study-science-speaks/
[12] http://www.monsanto.com/products/pages/animal-safety-assessment.aspx
[13] https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/05/24/academies-gmo-safety-finding-leaves-loose-end-say-activists-no-long-term-safety-studies/
[14] http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf
[15] http://www.informationweek.com/mobile/google-skybender-drone-project-aims-to-deliver-5g-wifi-/d/d-id/1324122
[16] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945755/
[17] http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/10/06/culprits-autism.aspx
[18] http://philadelphia.legalexaminer.com/fda-prescription-drugs/massive-fraud-in-merck-mmr-vaccine-testing/
[19] http://blogs.wsj.com/pharmalot/2015/06/08/merck-is-accused-of-stonewalling-over-effectiveness-of-mumps-vaccine/

Resources:

Man-Made Pollutants Found in Earth’s Deepest Ocean Trenches
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/man-made-pollutants-found-in-earth-s-deepest-ocean-trenches/

The Weston A Price Foundation / Environmental Toxins
http://www.westonaprice.org/environmental-toxins/

Roundup, cancer & the future of food
http://www.panna.org/blog/roundup-cancer-future-food?gclid=CMWAksCWms8CFQdkhgodlIcE1w

Scientifically Proven Method to Reverse Diabetes (Ad)

Image credit: Naturalblaze, pixabay

This article (Why Are There So Many Cancers Now?) can be republished with attribution to Catherine Frompovich, source article and Natural Blaze.com, keeping all links and bio intact.

17 comments:

  1. Of all the toxins listed, radiation is by far the weakest. Our DNA has evolved to handle low LET radiation and low fluence particle interaction. The onslaught of inorganics, heavy metals, and air pollutants is more likely to cause cancer than any man made nuclear mishap. The food we eat is a big factor as well. Lots of preservatives linked to cancer. Price of the modern age.

    Yet the human race is exponentially growing. So we are surviving as a species.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exponentially growing is what you see in the yeast culture petri dish in junior high school, now tell me, how did that turn out?

      A massive die off, followed by a minor regrowth, and then total death.

      Got it now? It's a system approach. And the hail Mary, science can save us now passes, just make the end point even more brutal.

      GMO foods with roundup to "feed the masses" how is that turning out?

      It is not the "price of a modern age", it is the cost of succumbing to money and greed takeover of corporations, governments, science, and medicine.

      Do you know a single person who doesn't know 2 or 3 people with cancer?

      Delete
    2. Its an exponemtial growth rate since tbe end of WW II, hence Baby Boomers and so on. Population is supercritical

      You and I knoe a lot of people with cancer. Yet we both know that pinpointing the specific cause is impossible. At the end of the day, the ability to ward off cancer os in all of us. Its called an imune system for a reason.

      Delete
    3. Ah the old "you can't prove it" lie. epidemiological science can actually prove it, therefore you lie.

      And no, just because you have a good immune system is no guaranteed that internal radiation won't cause a cancer anyway.

      Delete
    4. You can only go on what you can prove, not what you can imagine, claim as truth, without real proof. I dont disagree with your second paragraph. Yet if you or I get cancer without some massive acute,dose, you surely can not claim the source was due to nuclear energy from a specific plant. I was almost scalded to death from superheated nonnuclear steam at a powerplant i worked. I wasnt in the wrong place at the wrong time. Ask me what is more dangerous, id say superheated steam. I know how to protect myself from radiation. Doesnt mean im not going to get cancer. You might eat a Twinkie or beef jerky today, get cancer 30 years later. Doesnt mean it was from nuclear. You have to prove it was, as Hitchens Razor says the onus is in the person making the claim.

      Frankly I just dont understand why a reasonable person would make shit up, and call it truth without evidence. You seem to be arguing on faith, or beliefs, not facts. This isnt a religious or ideological debate. Yet you seem to come from the ideology bent. As engineers, we go on facts, not beliefs on this matter. I outlined where there is no forensic evidence for your claims. 100% of these events (there have been 60 the past 60 years, the last one in 1999, and each one had the same tell tale evidence.

      Are you saying a purposed prompt criticality at Fukushima should not have the same nuclear signs as the 60 other events? Those of us that study these accident scenarios professionally (so we can prevent/protect people) know the signs, not Gundersen.

      On that note, why am I or anyone expected to be swayed by your claims when the signs of the other 60 criticalities are just not there.

      I say you have a captive audience with the antinukes, but that doesnt make you or Gundersen an authority on the subject. Like i said before, any nuclear engineer knows the kinetics of the neutron chain reaction. However in reading his email to you, he conviently misses the most important features of these events.

      Because he plays for the other side, and gets paid to generate fear and anger. The world doesnt need angry old men with a chip on their shoulder to influence the sheeple.

      Delete
    5. You can only go on what you can prove, not what you can imagine, claim as truth, without real proof. I dont disagree with your second paragraph. Yet if you or I get cancer without some massive acute,dose, you surely can not claim the source was due to nuclear energy from a specific plant. I was almost scalded to death from superheated nonnuclear steam at a powerplant i worked. I wasnt in the wrong place at the wrong time. Ask me what is more dangerous, id say superheated steam. I know how to protect myself from radiation. Doesnt mean im not going to get cancer. You might eat a Twinkie or beef jerky today, get cancer 30 years later. Doesnt mean it was from nuclear. You have to prove it was, as Hitchens Razor says the onus is in the person making the claim.

      Frankly I just dont understand why a reasonable person would make shit up, and call it truth without evidence. You seem to be arguing on faith, or beliefs, not facts. This isnt a religious or ideological debate. Yet you seem to come from the ideology bent. As engineers, we go on facts, not beliefs on this matter. I outlined where there is no forensic evidence for your claims. 100% of these events (there have been 60 the past 60 years, the last one in 1999, and each one had the same tell tale evidence.

      Are you saying a purposed prompt criticality at Fukushima should not have the same nuclear signs as the 60 other events? Those of us that study these accident scenarios professionally (so we can prevent/protect people) know the signs, not Gundersen.

      On that note, why am I or anyone expected to be swayed by your claims when the signs of the other 60 criticalities are just not there.

      I say you have a captive audience with the antinukes, but that doesnt make you or Gundersen an authority on the subject. Like i said before, any nuclear engineer knows the kinetics of the neutron chain reaction. However in reading his email to you, he conviently misses the most important features of these events.

      Because he plays for the other side, and gets paid to generate fear and anger. The world doesnt need angry old men with a chip on their shoulder to influence the sheeple.

      Delete
    6. Yo haven't presented shite for proof of "forensic evidence".

      All facts point to the nuclear type explosion, the runaway chain reaction, called Moderated Prompt Criticality.

      Delete
  2. What the fuck to radiotoxic materials decay into?... heavy metals right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It takes a long time to decay to lead. Its not as plentiful as real lead. Look at the Uranium and Thorium decay chain.

      Delete
  3. Durnford gets 3 yrs probation. He should have served time. Menace 2 society.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So you support trumped up charges, of stalking? Which he did not do?

      I see, you support government overreach, and gloat that an anti-nuclear activist was "silenced", the shame is on you

      Delete
    2. No. I support people living lawful lives. He was charged and convicted based on evidence. The goverment acted responsibly because someone acted irresponsibly. Antinukes can be antinukes. I live in a society of free expression. That freedom came at a price. It doesnt mean freedom of expression involves harassment, and the call for physical harm.

      Even you agree he was over the top. The shame is on people that on the surface, want peace and harmony, tet on the other hand, act no different than those that want to silence those with a different and even professional scientists.

      The issue here isnt antinuke or proponent. Its about someone that broke the law and what law-abiding society should do to prevent this criminal behavior.

      Can he just live within the law? I read the courts conditions. It didn't say he had to silence his petty vendetta against nuclear.

      He has,to live within the law, like all of us.

      Can he do that without going off the deep end?

      Vegas odds say he will not rehabilitate, and attack those that disagree with him

      He isnt an antunuclear activist more so than a convicted criminal with a short leash.

      Gloating? No. Im not gloating. I feel sorry for someone that feels compelled to let their passions get the best of them, to the point they call on doing harm to decent hard-working people.

      Delete
    3. Lying scientists deserve Nuremberg type trials. To betray those who pay your salaries, is a horrible crime.

      Delete
    4. Neither Jay Cullen nor Kenny Boy Buessler are "decent" people. They know better, and yet they accept their bribes to present the lies that their handlers want them to "find".

      Delete
  4. Yo Stock, subscribed to your feed today. Good work documenting the issues. Your use of links to credible scientific work and peer-reviewed publications such as Elsevier is appreciated. Will be looking forward to reading the scientific articles. This is like a compendium of research. Good work. Reminds me a bit of Green Med Journal. You might want to subscribe to that. Might contribute there when I can find more time for research, and peers to write, edit with to make contributions. BTW, am archiving own research posts with the docs I'm finding to facilitate writing later. Glad to hear things are going well on the home front.
    Cheers, HT

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aloha HT, indeed, it is difficult to keep track of the good resources that we find, and be able to find them again. I have articles at Nukepro that even I have difficulty finding, LOL. The blogger search function is sometimes quite a joke.

      Delete
  5. SwagBucks is an high paying get-paid-to site.

    ReplyDelete

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments