Please share far and wide!

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

The Latest Fukushima Lie? "The Ocean is Back to Normal"

The latest lie of "Ocean Radiation Is Back to Normal" got picked up far and wide.  See all the links at the bottom also.   stock out

and see at the bottom of the article
" If things are “just fine,” why has the EPA drawn up a new proposal that would permit an amount of radiation in our drinking water that would be equivalent to 250 chest x-rays in one year?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


After World War 2, they conducted trials at Nuremberg, specifically aimed at Scientists who lied to the public during the war.    The scientists have a large responsibility to tell the truth to the public, and the public MUST put their trust in the scientists.    Very often, it is the public who is footing the bill for the scientists salaries.

At Nuremberg, some of these scientists were put to death.

The poster children for the modern Lying Scientists are

  1. Ken Buessler (Kenny Boy) and 
  2. Jay Cullen (Jackass Culling) 
Their audacity in telling tall tales has increased.

See the title in the Picture.

No data is presented to make this claim, and in fact, they sloppily also state that radiation is expected to peak in 2015/2016



Quoting from the Article
It is likely that maximum radiation levels will be attained off the North American coast in the 2015-16 period, before declining to around the level associated with background nuclear weapon testing by 2020.
 http://www.maritime-executive.com/article/fukushima-radiation-levels-decreasing-rapidly 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And the criminal Japan Times claims that radiation levels are "nearly normal".

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/07/04/national/science-health/pacific-ocean-radiation-back-near-normal-after-fukushima-study/#.V3wREaLzMWk

 I almost want to puke reading these weak attempts at lies and minimizations.

And of course, they banned me for trying to expose some truth.




http://indianexpress.com/article/world/world-news/five-years-after-fukushima-meltdown-pacific-ocean-radiation-levels-back-near-normal-2892944/

http://www.prameyanews7.com/en/jul2016/globe/27666/Pacific-Ocean-radiation-back-to-normal-after-Fukushima.htm

Lies, lies
http://www.pressreader.com/

http://newssummedup.com/a/uyoqow

One $cientist, Masque, admitted some truth, their real concern is the drying up of the grant money.   LOL ouch

Masque said it was a major concern that funds were running out for ongoing monitoring of radioactive material from Fukushima.

http://www.chinadailyasia.com/eyeonasia/2016-07/05/content_15458246.html

-----------------------------------------------------------
Majia (actually wrote 2 books on Fukushima) came up with a great article debunking this propaganda.

https://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2016/07/writing-history-and-legacy-of-fukushima.html

Pacific Ocean back to normal? Hell no!
A well documented rebuttal to this article is here: Bottom line, radiation is still around 600% to 1000% higher than before the accident, all over the Pacific. The sea creatures have been filtering out the radiation, its called Concentration Factors, There are numerous mass die offs, and a very important biological structure called "Chitin" is a radiation magnet and Chitin is destroyed by radiation.
https://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2016/07/writing-history-and-legacy-of-fukushima.html
I tried to post a summary and link to her article on the Japan Times, and it was quickly censored.   Those bastards!


-----------------------------------------------------------------
At ENENEWS a participant "from a distance" who is often right on the money, had this to say....

from a distance
From the article laconic93 posted >>
" If things are “just fine,” why has the EPA drawn up a new proposal that would permit an amount of radiation in our drinking water that would be equivalent to 250 chest x-rays in one year? Eco Watch reports that in early June 2016, the EPA quietly issued several proposals that would allow radiation contamination levels in drinking water that are far and beyond what the Safe Drinking Water Act currently allows."

from a distance
EVERYONE,
SUBMIT your comment to the EPA telling them your opinion >>

https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/06/10/2016-13786/notice-of-availability-draft-protective-action-guide-pag-for-drinking-water-after-a-radiological





No comments:

Post a Comment

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments