Please share far and wide!

Thursday, June 16, 2016

Radiation Pollution, Enabled By A False Dose Model, Is Causing a Cancer/Disease Epidemic

Another good interview with Dr. Busby on ICRP + the FALSE RISK MODEL:
Dr. Busby said:

"…The governments of all countries have been regulating the emissions from nuclear sites and the exposures of humans on the basis of a FALSE RISK MODEL === A false relationship between exposure to radiation and the health effects that they produce. And this risk model, which was developed in 1952 in order to underpin the development of nuclear weapons, has been broadly unchanged since 1952.

It's held by a group of people called the International Commission on Radiological Protection…. The Scientific Secretary of this organization met with me here in Stockholm in April of last year and at least conceded in a debate that we had, which was videoed, that the risk model is indeed false. It cannot be used for predicting or explaining the health effects of exposures to substances like Strontium90, and Cesium137, and Plutonium and so forth ….

This is the biggest public health scandal in recorded human history. People have been systematically contaminated and poisoned by these substances since … global weapons testing… the nuclear fallout from atomic bombs…and it is this exposure …that is essentially the cause of the current cancer epidemic.”




http://owndoc.com/cancer/radiation-true-cause-of-cancer/

From the link immediately above:
The dirty secret about internal emitters
The aforementioned stakeholders in keeping us ignorant about the risks of radiologically contaminated food know full well that alpha radiation is the elephant in the room, the sword of Damocles hanging over the head of everyone who eats.

Obesity is linked to cancer in reality because people who eat more, ingest more internal radiation emitters, including the very dangerous alpha emitters. The more you eat, the more alpha emitters end up in your blood stream and in your cells, and the greater the risk of a double DNA strand breakage that can’t be repaired and turns into cancer because the cell does not commit suicide, neither stops dividing and the immune system is not in the full 100% of cases able to kill the tumor before it’s larger than a grain of sand or at most a grain of rice.
When you’re older, these mechanisms become less efficient and will eventually fail. Alpha exposure from an internal emitter will then inevitably result in cancer. Public information on alpha emitters obfuscates the issue. Alpha radiation is portrayed as the lowest risk of all, in pictures that show that alpha particles can’t even penetrate the skin. It is as if they want to make them appear harmless.

17 comments:

  1. This is as cut and dry as it gets. LNT always was pre-meditated random acts of murder.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, the whole "calculated" dose model is a crying joke, a crime on humanity.

      Delete
    2. Its Busby that is incorrect. He says what he says because his methods have been reviewed, vetted, and dismissed as junk science. This isnt Galileo going up against the Catholic Church. Its a foregone conclusion we humans have our own internal emitters. Its what keeps our inmune system going.

      If radionuclides as Busby points out are sooo dangerous then shut down the fossil industry, dont burn oil, or run gasoline cars. All those products contain trace uranium which in turn, have a finite spontaneous fission rate that puts out the same double humped fission product curve

      Busby fails to take confounders into account properly.

      He gets rich on you antinukes.

      His net worth over 1 million British pounds.

      Follow the money.

      Delete
    3. LNT is a hypothesis at best. As a hypothesis, it needs testing and validation. Its used as a regulatory metric because its conservative. Its a logical fallacy to believe LNT and "no safe dose" are joined at the hip.

      Delete
    4. Its Busby that is incorrect. He says what he says because his methods have been reviewed, vetted, and dismissed as junk science. This isnt Galileo going up against the Catholic Church. Its a foregone conclusion we humans have our own internal emitters. Its what keeps our inmune system going.

      If radionuclides as Busby points out are sooo dangerous then shut down the fossil industry, dont burn oil, or run gasoline cars. All those products contain trace uranium which in turn, have a finite spontaneous fission rate that puts out the same double humped fission product curve

      Busby fails to take confounders into account properly.

      He gets rich on you antinukes.

      His net worth over 1 million British pounds.

      Follow the money.

      Delete
    5. As if 1 million pounds is any "big money" sheesh, that is less than a third of what a person needs to retire.

      "keeps the immune system going" provide one bit of evidence for that wild assertation.

      Delete
    6. You are alive on this planet because your bodys immune system works. Cancer cells are in everyone. The difference is our body's ability to keep it in check. Its not about low doses. Its about the totality of all things attacking our bodies.

      Delete
    7. If I had half a million British pounds I'd retire comfortably. Think about how people go about their business. Why do you think Busby hitches his wagon to the antinuclear cause? Because its the most profitable for him. He eschews the mainstream because there is no money in it for his skill set. He is better off financially by promoting junk science than actually doing real science. Else he would have government and legit business contracts coming out of his ***, like real scientists. So he peddles his message to the antigovernment, antibusiness crowd, which happens to be antinukes, leftists, Greens, you get the picture.

      Delete
    8. You are alive on this planet because your bodys immune system works. Cancer cells are in everyone. The difference is our body's ability to keep it in check. Its not about low doses. Its about the totality of all things attacking our bodies.

      Delete
    9. "cancer cells are in everyone" LOL, one of the newest lies of the nuclear cartel. Confound it!

      Living in a toxic environment DOES NOT lessen the damage that nuclear and its radiation causes.

      Delete
    10. We live in an environment that sees an exponential growth in world population the past 70 years. There are 7 billion and in 20 years it will be 15 billion. Thats hardly a toxic environment. Nees flash - air and water are toxic. Air in the blood, water in the lungs.

      Delete
  2. Lemme guess potassium 40 is equal to plutonium somehow... they arent though, are they...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Radiation is energy. K40 emits a high energy gamma. Plutonium is a weak alpha emitter. Its toxicity comes from chemical, not nuclear means. It binds to blood. Surprise.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Radiation is energy. K40 emits a high energy gamma. Plutonium is a weak alpha emitter. Its toxicity comes from chemical, not nuclear means. It binds to blood. Surprise.

    ReplyDelete
  5. the k40 gamma track is how long? and when i eat plutonium how are internally emitted alphas not dangerous? You fucks cant build a plant in 44 years that would even operate for an afternoon before it had to shutdown. I cant trust you to tell me anything that isn't already in an advertisement. Fuck you wholly and completely sir. That is all.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Its not how long but total energy deposited. Frankly I think its a desperation play ro go up against the ICRP, the top of the food chain when it comes to radiation protection. ECRR are just posers and hacks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yo pimp for nuclear....damage due to radiation and its associated heavy metals and other elements is DUE TO SEVERAL HUNDRED variables. Because they affect different people, ages, sexes, and unique individual characteristics, differently, its means that the lie of assigning a calculated dose model based on the most "critical organ" and then calculating only the cancer effects.....is a HUGE LIE that is nothing less than premeditated MURDER.

      Delete

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments