Please share far and wide!

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Ugly Women Rise to the Top in Nuclear, Radiation, and Environmental, and Then Take Their Revenge

I judge a person by their actions, but I refuse to NOT ACKNOWLEDGE obvious interpretations based by observation, in a very politically 'incorrect' manner.

Look at some of the "women" and I use that tern loosely because what I see is only some XX chromosome without the good psychological aspects of being female, per the examples of women that gravitate to position in nuclear and environmental control. Some of these, in fact most of these, are beasts, "and now they take their revenge".

The lawyer installed at Hanford.
 http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2016/03/hanford-absurdly-overbudget-unsafe.html

The hormesis "Doctor Strangelove" Carol S. Marcus promoting "why deprive people of radiation" as she make $400k a year injecting them with radiation.

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2015/08/nrc-is-proposing-to-increase-radiation.html
 
Gina McCarthy who turned off the radiation monitors after Fukushima and then was rewarded with
the top post at EPA.


http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2015/10/questions-for-gina-mccarthy.html







 Lying ass Tammy at WIPP with her "Plutonium is the same as radiation from a banana 'dose is

dose' meme".    This is her official portrait, keep in mind this is as good as it gets.


Clinton….who threw the USA under the bus to cut some deal to her benefit, in exchange for promising Japan that we would buy their contaminated food without testing.

—————————-
Certainly there are "non pretty" women who are great people, who serve humanity, who nuture and protect, who produce good science, products, teachings, etc.

But it sure seems like some of the ugly ones….put their energy into rising to power, and taking their revenge, like the Godzilla song.

You can detest them even more when watching them lie on video


Here is Gina McCarthy lying about Flint poisonings

http://www.infowars.com/epa-evades-criminal-acts-once-again/

 

 



25 comments:

  1. U might want to add one of these pictures https://duckduckgo.com/?q=lady+barbara+judge&t=ffnt&iax=1&ia=images
    Plowboy

    ReplyDelete
  2. C'mon you have to know there are attractive women at the top of some nuclear enterprises as well. It's not good to come off as sexist in general. Man, woman, I don't care as long as they do the right thing in the grand scheme of things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In government? show me them? these beasts are doing the wrong thing, on purpose.

      Delete
    2. That's ludicrous. Misogyny isn't your bag. Where there is a woman in power it's not a pro or antinuclear thing. It's a woman thing. I say elect them all.


      http://www.rantlifestyle.com/2014/03/17/20-hottest-female-politicians/

      Delete
  3. Check out number 18 and note the contribution of her famous grandfather (in my circle) to nuclear technology.


    http://www.businessinsider.com/50-sexy-scientists-2013-2

    ReplyDelete
  4. Heather is not uggo.

    http://talknuclear.ca/2015/09/4173/

    ReplyDelete
  5. And of course, he is the crown jewel debunking your thesis. I truly hope she succeeds. It would reduce actinide volume tremendoulsy.

    http://www.transatomicpower.com/?team=dr-leslie-dewan

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bethany is very easy on the eye and a nuclear scientist.

    https://www.aps.org/programs/women/scholarships/womanmonth/2014.cfm

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ya that "sexy science" draws in the best and brightest. Until they realize they been had, by then they are addicted to the precious.....and stuck with a horrible life.

      Delete
    2. There is no addiction. Just work. We are put here to work.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  7. Ugly women on the antinuclear side - do you really want to ride this train?

    I can start with the Grand Dame, move on to the Chancellor of Germany, yet somehow this one strikes me as poster child for the unattractive. Have you heard her gig? Who would want that genitalia?


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NYT6TYgTg8

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dude, women are much more than "genitalia", sheesh. But I am talking about how the seriously socially challenged, seriously ugly, get little social reinforcement, rise to the top in government, in radiation and environment.

      Delete
    2. There are beautiful people that rise in govt as well, and either muck it up or do well by people. Looks aren't a driver in nuclear. There are enough people in it for a Law of Large Numbers which means average.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. I know they are more than that. I was referring to her specifically. Double bagger at least. Ew.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    6. Many of the "beautiful or charming" that rise in government are actually sociopaths, with that superficial charm, and ability to lie with no outward sign that a lie spotter could otherwise spot.

      Delete
    7. Sociopaths are not driven to any particular profession. I can spot some mean spirited comments without judging a person as sociopathic. However knowing what I know about human nature, it would appear accusing people of being a particular brand of loathsome human without any basis is itself sociopathic. Interesting those that smelt it usually delt it. So be careful calling people what you may be guilty of in the first place. Examine your motives.

      Delete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nuke pukes are all ugly to the core IMO regardless of how their physical appearance may be perceived up to the moment when I discover what line of work that they do and they get uglier with every action to promote nuclear as safe and necessary to the gullible public. I'm not surprised that this thread opened the door for pro nuke pukes to make use of political correctness and to portray the author as sexist or bigoted even though it was meant as an amusing, satirical post that turned out to hold much truth. Stock's examples may have once been aesthetically pleasing to the eyes but it may be that just like the bad witches of folklore that the forces of karmic justice visit upon the worst of their lots and give them a good beating with the ugly stick commensurate with their vile contributions to the science of destructive technologies and their lies to promote the vile crap they are heavily vested and,or beholden to. Either way this thread opened the door to the only attack on stock and like-minded 'newsers that might might strike a nerve with the mainstream public who have and are fed lies by the promoters of the worst thing that science and technology ever pushed on the same public in history. It's ironic that many of those who read the thread will condemn stock and the well-meaning crew at ENEnews & NukePro while scrolling through the text as they sit awaiting their own turn to sit in the chemo chairs of packed infusion centers dying from the effects of pro-nuke lies and man-made radiation. If the most truthful arguments that the nuke pukes can come up with are related to one of us calling them butt ugly then it appears that our fears and focus on the inept, incompetent, corrupt and hazardous to health obsolete, junk science that the still untamed, therefor obsolete technology of all things nuclear is well founded.
    History would already have proven that had they not taken such great care to cover up the truth in order to protect and promote their investments and their ridiculous bombs that will inevitably wipe out life on earth if the process of designing, testing and manufacturing them hasn't already begun our extinction. I wish the braniacs who pay so much attention to what we have to say would focus their attention on developing the technology to undo the damage that they've done. How much longer than the 70+ yrs that they still haven't tackled the part of the equation that Satan didn't whisper in Einstein and Oppenheimer's ears can we go on surviving the increasingly toxic world they created without it??!! P.S., The examples of allegedly "good looking" women given are moot points if their tits look like Madame Curies hands and have more than one nipple each that glows like the Tritium night sights on my Glock when they are aroused!! ;-)
    LOL.. Now that this thread is done you can get back to promoting your mutagenic garbage and we can get back to promoting the simple, non-toxic technology that should have already ended it before your haughty heroes end life as we know it for everyone. Good luck with that since the answers and common sense seem to have eluded the nuke puke braniacs despite their combined IQ's finding that they've been weighed, measured & still found wanting....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TY Kathleen, you could be a writer, well in fact, you are, LOL

      Delete
  10. Two words - Leslie Dewan.
    Two more words - Absolutely gorgeous.

    Now all the crazy misogynists please return to your closets and start crying into your collection of ladies undergarments.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Two words - Leslie Dewan.
    Two more words - Absolutely Gorgeous.

    Now all you misogynists please return to your closets for a good long cry in your collection of ladies undergarments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just love the "control of the narrative" using words like anti-Semitic, and misogynists.

      Words that are not really understood by 95% of the population except that to be one is deplorable. Words chosen so that even their spelling is mysterious, so that the average person doesn't even want to research them or use them....words to protect a cause that is less than genuine.

      To protect the Jewish push to control the earth, the Jewish push to portray themselves as victims. The mostly American push for radical feminism, and to pussify the American military among other things.

      Yes we are just beginning to see how control of the narrative, out of the gate, is so important in the neuro-linguistic world that we live in.

      Delete

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments