Please share far and wide!

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Cancer Started Sky Rocketing in 1945, What Else Happened in 1945, Coud It Be The Start of the Nuclear Cartel?



It fairly hard to find historical data on cancer incidence.

Cited near the bottom is an article that state circa 1900, 3 of 100 deaths were due to cancer.
A chart from the town of Boston 1811 showed 5 cancer deaths of 942.    Link and picture is at the far bottom herein.

What are the current stats on cancer deaths?   Honestly I haven't included any information here except in links.   I deem the answer to that question as so absurdly obvious to not deserve energy put into it.

How may people do you know who have cancer right now?     Drop a comment please.




The focus now is on "mortality", which in the twisted world of Big Med, just means that if you live for 5 years after diagnosis that your treatment was a "sucess".    If you die at 5 years and 1 day, then the cancer didn't kill you.  

They try to avoid clear presentation of "incidences" of cancer, aka new cases.   Some data is out there, but the spin is to try to show how Big Med/Big Pharma is "sucessful".
================================================
This chart from the New England Journal of Medicine is telling

find it here
http://www.nejm.org/action/showMediaPlayer?doi=10.1056%2FNEJMp1113569&aid=NEJMp1113569_attach_1&area=&



Don't even get me started on Chemotherapy.    Its a broad spectrum human poison, but by pounding down the cancer, it allows the impacted human to "survive" for 5 years, although it is a pretty sketchy quality of life in that time.

I found another large treatise on cancer rates, their last report from 2011.     hmmmmmmmm



A lot of alternate media have jumped on this idea
Considering that Fukushima has released more radiation than 528 air detonation nuclear tests combined, and remembering that radiation from those tests is still affecting people around the globe to this day, the problems caused by Fukushima are going to be with us for generations.
There are 437 operative nuclear power plants world wide, and another 68 under construction. A dozen more are at the planning stage. Are we really so hungry for electricity that we are willing to risk annihilation to get it? What’s the point if generation after generation will suffer increased cancer rates?
- See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/the-effects-of-nuclear-testing-since-1945-shows-us-what-the-long-term-effects-of-fukushima-will-be_012014#sthash.Og2u1PPF.dpuf
Considering that Fukushima has released more radiation than 528 air detonation nuclear tests combined, and remembering that radiation from those tests is still affecting people around the globe to this day, the problems caused by Fukushima are going to be with us for generations.
There are 437 operative nuclear power plants world wide, and another 68 under construction. A dozen more are at the planning stage. Are we really so hungry for electricity that we are willing to risk annihilation to get it? What’s the point if generation after generation will suffer increased cancer rates?
Considering that Fukushima has released more radiation than 528 air detonation nuclear tests combined, and remembering that radiation from those tests is still affecting people around the globe to this day, the problems caused by Fukushima are going to be with us for generations.
There are 437 operative nuclear power plants world wide, and another 68 under construction. A dozen more are at the planning stage. Are we really so hungry for electricity that we are willing to risk annihilation to get it? What’s the point if generation after generation will suffer increased cancer rates?
- See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/the-effects-of-nuclear-testing-since-1945-shows-us-what-the-long-term-effects-of-fukushima-will-be_012014#sthash.Og2u1PPF.dpuf

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/the-effects-of-nuclear-testing-since-1945-shows-us-what-the-long-term-effects-of-fukushima-will-be_012014

USA Today (Quoting the WHO) weighs in
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/02/04/cancer-cases-worldwide-increase/5200445/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&dlvrit=206567









New cancer cases worldwide expected to skyrocket


Cancer deaths worldwide are predicted to rise from 8.2 million annually to 13 million a year with two decades, according to a new report.

4050 1002 53 LINKEDIN 69 COMMENTMORE
The incidence of cancer worldwide is growing at an alarming pace, and there is an urgent need to implement strategies to prevent and curb the disease, according to a report from the World Health Organization.
======================================================
Indeed, one of the "One Liner Lies Abour Cancer" is that most of cancer can be blamed on us living longer.    What a bunch of bunk.

http://phys.org/news/2010-10-scientists-cancer-purely-man-made.html
Finding only one case of the disease in the investigation of hundreds of Egyptian mummies, with few references to cancer in literary evidence, proves that cancer was extremely rare in antiquity. The disease rate has risen massively since the Industrial Revolution, in particular childhood cancer – proving that the rise is not simply due to people living longer.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2010-10-scientists-cancer-purely-man-made.html#jCp
Finding only one case of the disease in the investigation of hundreds of Egyptian mummies, with few references to cancer in literary evidence, proves that cancer was extremely rare in antiquity. The disease rate has risen massively since the Industrial Revolution, in particular childhood cancer – proving that the rise is not simply due to people living longer.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2010-10-scientists-cancer-purely-man-made.html#jCp
Finding only one case of the disease in the investigation of hundreds of Egyptian mummies, with few references to cancer in literary evidence, proves that cancer was extremely rare in antiquity. The disease rate has risen massively since the Industrial Revolution, in particular childhood cancer – proving that the rise is not simply due to people living longer.
==========================================================
The year 1900: Cancer caused only 3 out 100 deaths in the
US. Breast cancer was basically unheard of.

- Food manufacturers began developing "better living
through chemistry" products like artificial sweeteners
(saccharin), taste additives (MSG), partially hydrogenated
vegetable shortening and margarine.

http://www.answers.com/Q/Is_there_more_cancer_today_than_hundred_years_ago
Considering that Fukushima has released more radiation than 528 air detonation nuclear tests combined, and remembering that radiation from those tests is still affecting people around the globe to this day, the problems caused by Fukushima are going to be with us for generations.
There are 437 operative nuclear power plants world wide, and another 68 under construction. A dozen more are at the planning stage. Are we really so hungry for electricity that we are willing to risk annihilation to get it? What’s the point if generation after generation will suffer increased cancer rates?
- See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/the-effects-of-nuclear-testing-since-1945-shows-us-what-the-long-term-effects-of-fukushima-will-be_012014#sthash.Og2u1PPF.dpuf

Considering that Fukushima has released more radiation than 528 air detonation nuclear tests combined, and remembering that radiation from those tests is still affecting people around the globe to this day, the problems caused by Fukushima are going to be with us for generations.
There are 437 operative nuclear power plants world wide, and another 68 under construction. A dozen more are at the planning stage. Are we really so hungry for electricity that we are willing to risk annihilation to get it? What’s the point if generation after generation will suffer increased cancer rates?
- See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/the-effects-of-nuclear-testing-since-1945-shows-us-what-the-long-term-effects-of-fukushima-will-be_012014#sthash.aka5Dlwk.dpuf

You can't blame nuclear because it would hurt their feelings. They want to keep up the PR spin that no deaths and no diseases are caused by them. You are blowing that PR out the window...

Dr. Busby; 40 - 60 MILLION Downwinder Deaths Due To Global Open Air Nuclear Weapons Testing Fallout 1945 to 2003
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/04/40-60-million-deaths-due-to-global-open.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is a good scientific reference

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21166/pdf

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 And here, a "stupid rat mother" (see link for information on how nuke promoters think that concerned mothers are 'stupid rats'), well this stupid rat mother using Facebook puts a statistical survey together  that a statistics professor at Northwestern deems .000000001 chance that it is random, showing massive cancers in St Louis after nuclear waste was allowed to leak out of rusting barrels.

It shows 750 cancers in a 4 square mile area, and 3 cojoined twins.   Thanks nuclear.

http://archive.ksdk.com/news/article/358520/3/Cancer-cluster-map-of-St-Louis





10 comments:

  1. The thing about the middle decades of the last century was that technology started to take off. This meant plastics, chemicals, pesticides, and a lot of confounders. You can't pin the cause on nuclear when there were tens of thousands of other more likely precursors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes but nuclear attacks dna directly is particularly insideous and tumor forming. much more than chemicals. much higher morbidity and mortality. mutates cells viruses bacteria genome.

      Delete
    2. Did you look at the charts? It wasn't a slow process of acceleration.

      It was a highly sloped ramp up EXACTLY at the first nuclear bombs.

      Delete
  2. You can't blame nuclear because it would hurt their feelings. They want to keep up the PR spin that no deaths and no diseases are caused by them. You are blowing that PR out the window...

    Dr. Busby; 40 - 60 MILLION Downwinder Deaths Due To Global Open Air Nuclear Weapons Testing Fallout 1945 to 2003
    http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/04/40-60-million-deaths-due-to-global-open.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Doc, I added your link into the body of the article.

      Delete



  3. http://alternativeanalysis.blogspot.co.uk/p/nuclear-fallout-and-lung-cancer.html?m=1

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have mapped the rise and fall of the global lung cancer epidemic
    to the period of atomic weapons testing 1945 - 1985 and there is a strong correlation

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great stuff, I wonder how to "re-blog".
      Towards the middle there are 2 charts that look like they are labelled the same, but look different. Also at least one critical spelling mistake.

      Not to be a grammar Nazi or anything, thanks for contributing.

      Delete
    2. Thanks! I have added more headings to the charts, I believe the charts you refer to were crude rates and ASR. I have also added more charts under Sweden and the Russian Federation that you will not have seen yet.
      May I ask what the critical spelling mistake was so I can correct it.
      As for re-blog I shall investigate as to how to make that easy but I have some other evidence to add to the page, so it is not finished yet!

      Delete
    3. You have eposure instead of exposure

      Delete

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments