Please share far and wide!

Sunday, May 3, 2015

Storage of Nuclear Waste and Other Radiation "Products" -- New Mexico and Texas Fighting for the "Precious"

It is such a travesty that humans continue making more radionuclides. We need to stop. The trick of turning matter into energy looks like a free lunch at first blush, but in reality is the most expensive and dangerous lunch we have ever had rammed down our throats.

That said, I agree that we need to do something with the waste we have. At the rate we are going I see around less than 50 to 100 year survival of the human race, especially once the Pacific is truly dead and the added stressors cause more people to lash out and terrorists attack the ground stored super bombs called "spent fuel".

 So we should do something to kick the can down the road in a "retrievable way". For basic safety, the nuclear waste needs to be stored underground, but it is absolutely essential that it accessible and retrievable, even if very difficult. You can see what happened at WIPP, they mixed up a potion they couldn't control, then the salt walls and ceiling which were supposed to "seal" the waste by creeping in at few inches a year decided that it preferred to come crashing down instead.

So what will happen when these 500,000 barrels already in WIPP are all corroded (that is the plan actually, not a conspiracy) and all the substances mix together and separate out by density? An underground super bomb? Or a belching mini-OKLO under ground reactor sending up radioactive gases and occasional "puffs" of Plutonium? Would there be any fix possible? Certainly not.

Human will cannot even handle the current messes we have, much less this much more dangerous mess that we are hurtling towards.

 That comprises my argument that it must be retrievable and accessible. I would also argue that in a runaway reaction, we also need the ability for a "hail Mary" collapse and fill of the mine and mine shafts. Explosive devices....a last ditch effort to extend our time on this planet.

Instead we have propaganda, i.e. the new nukist playbook, that storing waste at ground level is now determined "safe" by the NRC".    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now I hear that even the dry casks are getting chintzier and of inferior construction. Certainly if we kick the can, we need to kick it at least 50 to 100 years. Like the tanks at Hanford that are already past their design life, and doing what is expected, contaminating the ground water, our drinking water. Yucca mountain is a lousy choice and always was. There is an important water table right below it. So let's do something.....but do it RIGHT

3 comments:

  1. "Spent Nuclear Fuel Containers - How It's Made Minisode"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WuklVLi9f8

    Those are quite the material rollers used to make the tube shapes! Heavy Metal!!!
    I wonder if surface (aluminum) oxides & a seemingly loose encaged fit are enough to prevent corrosion & adding impurities to the liquid contents.

    Am hoping it's still Penn. (&Teller) State Stainless/Steel. Didn't see a "Made in USA" sticker though. The sticker is the most important part of assembly container, in that it is a testement to the fact that something is still manufactured on this continent, IMHO.


    That reminds me ... there are presumed to be many new taxpayer funded "cities" that have been constructed underground over the last decade or so. If one close to an existing .mil base were repurposed for waste storage, that might be more isolated that anything existing near Carlsbad, if deep enough, AND free of WIPPy-PuFF Fukupy.

    What about Cheyenne Mountain? An Einstein–Rosen bridge portal device also known as a "Chappa'ai" (Cha-Pa-Eye) would really be handy now. Please tell me N/A is acquiring one to match the Chinese Chappa'ai.
    http://www.pakalertpress.com/what-the-hell-is-china-building-here/

    Now THAT would end waste issues (not MOx or NukeWar issues though).
    Redonkulous, you say? I can dream, can't i?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WHPPSS!

      "I wonder if surface (aluminum) oxides & a seemingly loose encaged fit are enough to prevent corrosion & adding impurities to the liquid contents."

      That was concerning the Aluminum plates used as neutron shielding.

      Delete
    2. I am sure they will add some materials to make it even more dangerous.....

      "hey now that we know these containers are really dangerous....you have to let us shove them into the ground (and ground water)"

      Delete

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments