Friday, August 1, 2014

Global Warming, Real Information from the NukePro

This was fairly hard to find this data and parse in into a format that made some sense.    Check out the charts and drop a comment.

PS I need to create a new BOX account to allow file sharing.     When I can do this, I will provide a link so that you can download my complete spreadsheet of temperature data, and you can verify it yourself.    Maybe even do some more advanced number crunching, or correlate them to nuke bomb testing and sunspots.    Have at it!     For now if you need the file, email me, and I will send it to you.

Bottom line, Global Warming has certainly occurred since 1880, but temperatures go in cycles, and "we" (meaning humans including scientists) do not understand them.   There is a lot of complex stuff that affects weather, and yours truly strongly believes that sunspots and other sun magnetic and electric effects and as also related to cosmic ray blocking are WAY more important than CO2 from fossil fuel burning.     Most of the Egg Head scientists don't even understand solar spots and are crappy at predicting cycles, and befuddled when there academia programmed minds can't operate to understand a process when it conflicts with their "training".

Bottom line---there has been NO GLOBAL WARMING over the past 17 years.    Isn't that an "inconvenient truth" for those who wish to transfer wealth via Cap and Trade type acts.    Also pretty inconveneint for those who wish to promote a dying nuclear energy field by stating that it can help reduce global warming.

Fact, we are seeing some more extreme weather months in the last 17 years, BUT the standard deviation is actually going down, see the chart.       What does it mean?

Simple.    Those in the boomer and post boomer generations have lived through a period of incredible weather stability.    In the far known and measured past, weather has been more extreme.   Just that fact alone helps the huge economic expansion of post WW2.     We had it good.     Now we are getting a few extreme spikes.  It will be hotter and colder, dryer and wetter going forward.     But global temperature has stalled out, and a reversal is likely.

Another big thing that is barely on most peoples radar is the earths magnetic pole shift, I can't deal with that one today, but realize it could be a massive effect on earth weather.

Check out the charts and drop a comment.




A reader at this site contributed a link to his own work, which proves that global warming is a scam, and that CO2 IS NOT a driver for upward temperatures.     He is a real engineer with a background similar to mine.    He has put real science to what is "know on a gut level".

http://agwunveiled.blogspot.ca/2013/12/calculated-meanglobal-temperatures-1610.html

And a frequent commenter here, Dud added in

No chart for sunspot activity?
Rectified, if you like --> http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/Zurich_Color_Small.jpg

Quote: "One of the possible explanations for a link between sunspots and weather is via cosmic rays. It is accepted that cosmic rays play a part in cloud formation by encouraging the nucleation of water droplets. It is also accepted that there is a negative correlation between sunspots and cosmic rays. Figure 5 demonstrates this link."


http://www.climatedata.info/Forcing/Forcing/sunspots.html


And amazingly, on Aug 1, 2014 when I published my proof that Global Warming is a scam, Suspicious Observers had a short comment on their daily video, and the statement that "there has been no warming for 17 years" and a link to a long video that goes deep into Global Warming scam.   I haven't watched it yet, but here it is.





 

43 comments:

  1. Thanks Stock--Nice work!! You clearly put a lot of time and effort into finding, compiling, entering, displaying and analyzing the data--with very good results.

    You conclusion is interesting and merits a closer look for me as this runs counter to my long-held assumptions/understanding about global warming. I'll need to come back to it later when I have more time.

    BTW--excellent graphs!

    Thanks again, Stock. This is really great stuff! :-)


    All the best,
    Sparky

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sparky, ENE appears to be down hard. Suspicious timing with the EPA comment period Aug 3 which is a Sunday.

      Any ideas?

      Delete
    2. Hi Stock, Strange--I posted a reply a few minutes ago and it disappeared. Try again:

      Sorry for my delayed response. Yes, The ENE blackout was VERY disturbing. Harlan and I have worked out arrangements for the 'Newser "workgroup" communications, but I think we'll need a bigger "room" as a back-up (if possible) in case ENE goes down long term.

      Thankfully, ENE is now up and running, with some apparent minor site repairs. Let's hope it lasts.

      I doubt, however, that ENE as a news aggregator and unique on-line community could be duplicated or replaced. I hope ENE Admin has fortified the site against these ever-evolving attacks.

      I know Nukepro has had it's share of attacks as well. Constant vigilance is necessary, which can be very time-consuming and costly. I'm preaching to the choir, I know....)

      Sparky out. :-)

      Delete
    3. Quote: "The ENE blackout"

      Huh? Haven't read The news there for the last two days.
      Am aware of some functionality at the site being broken though.
      That seemed to coincide with Micro$oft's DOJ-approved (IIRC) No-IP server takeover starting approximately June 30.
      https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/07/microsoft-and-noip-what-were-they-thinking

      When a site appears down, one could check http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ to confirm.

      If it is "just you", then perhaps some alternate DNS servers may help.
      http://pcsupport.about.com/od/tipstricks/a/free-public-dns-servers.htm

      Am no expert, yet i like to share what i have learned.

      Am hoping archive.org has everything vital there (including vital1!) has been backed up.


      Thank you ENE News, and thank you stock-sensei. Sakaido Hantai!

      Delete
    4. Ah, now i see the gap in posts.
      That was from 8:30 PM EDT, Aug 01 to 7:32 PM EDT, Aug 02.

      The first post after the blackout was ironically newsblackoutUSA's post.

      It sure is nice to see admin post again. http://enenews.com/forum-topic-discussion-thread-nuclear-issues-mar-25-2014-present/comment-page-60#comment-557990

      Looking forward to seeing if my theory concerning No-IP was correct (or not). Moreso looking forward to admin posting more.

      Long live ENEnews!

      Delete
  2. "Nukepro got your back with real information, not the disinformation of the MSM"

    Yeah! Thanks Nukepro!!

    Sparky

    ReplyDelete
  3. "They" own the power supply, the major water supply chain, the food chain. We pay them to live. The Anthropomorphic global warming scam was to devise a method of charging us for the air we breathe.
    Full spectrum.
    They also own the internet and built it for their own, consciousness control, purposes.
    Thanks for the work Nuke Pro
    Love xxx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aloha, no simple quick solutions here, however, unless we can win the battle against man made radiation, the other battles are trivial.

      Delete
    2. You are too modest, as you are actively working towards solutions via alternative energy. Does being "anti"-nuke not imply "instead" of "nukular" technology? However; it is as you say "no simple quick solutions".

      Break free of the chains that hold us in slavery &/or servitude.
      Vote with your dollars, veto with your feet by not patronizing "their" services (where reasonably possible).

      Neo-Patriotism means being loyal to fellow countrymen (& women), not the Incorporated "State" (should it not be a Partnership instead?).
      Am always wary of Nationalism and it's many feces, er ahem, faces.

      Household alternate energy production should be considered a vital part of Retirement planning, in my humble opine.

      Delete
  4. An equation, with only two drivers as independent variables, explains measured average global temperatures since before 1900 with 95% correlation, calculates credible values back to 1610, and predicts to 2037. CO2 change is not one of the drivers.

    Search AGW unveiled for the method, equation, data sources, history (hind cast to 1610) and predictions (to 2037).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dan, I tried to leave a comment at your website, but think it failed somehow while trying to log in to Wordpress.

      Anyway, your website and research is spectacular, it supports my personal work exactly.

      Delete
    2. http://agwunveiled.blogspot.ca/2013/12/calculated-meanglobal-temperatures-1610.html

      Delete
    3. Nice work, Mr. Pangburn (by the way)!

      I wish somebody had data on Oxygen and Noble gases in Sea-level atmosphere composition from this side of the new millennia.

      Delete
  5. Id like to pass the excel data through a neural network I developed for pattern recognition. If you are interested then you know how to get a hold of me at my work email. I think that would make us even for the nuclear air cleaning handbook. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Advise the basic strategy of said neural network, and pattern recognition strategies. Send me your email I don't have time to reivew the files, very busy now.

      Providing the secrets of the lie of global warming would not make us "equal" for Atoms providing a government spec and standards paper....sorry, thats a big no go.

      Delete
  6. Hi stock, I saw you posted this on enenews this morning but could only glance through... I just read the whole thing. This is fascinating. Sharing this and circulating. Thanks always.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Roger that, please circulate. 1M people can read some BS either way on global warming, but 10,000 who care and read this and take action could be the tipping point

      TIPP it good!

      Delete
  7. No chart for sunspot activity?
    Rectified, if you like --> http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/Zurich_Color_Small.jpg

    Quote: "One of the possible explanations for a link between sunspots and weather is via cosmic rays. It is accepted that cosmic rays play a part in cloud formation by encouraging the nucleation of water droplets. It is also accepted that there is a negative correlation between sunspots and cosmic rays. Figure 5 demonstrates this link."
    http://www.climatedata.info/Forcing/Forcing/sunspots.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. More extreme weather events to proceed with a trend towards cooling. Check.

    Will it be like envisioned in "The Coming Global SuperStorm" by Art Bell and Whitley Strieber and/or "The Day After Tomorrow"? I don't know, though i hope not. Those Mammoths with food in their mouths & bellies is compelling evidence. What is it evidence of though???

    ReplyDelete
  9. A repost from: http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2014/03/cancer-does-not-just-cause-cancer-it-is.html?showComment=1405754568780#c223107105179085618

    "Quote: "In a study published in July 2014, a team of scientists led by a researcher from the Desert Research Institute announced they had a discovered a new type of soot particle produced by wildfires. The particles, called “superaggregates,” are on average ten times longer and have a more compact shape than conventional soot particles from vehicles and cook stoves. Their distinctive shape means they likely have a more potent warming effect on the climate than other types of soot.

    “We found that superaggregates contribute up to 90-percent more warming than spherical sub-micrometer soot particles, which current climate models use,” said the study’s lead author, Rajan Chakrabarty. “These preliminary findings warrant further research to quantify the significant impact these particles may have on climate, human health, and air pollution around the world.”"

    http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=84002 "

    NorthWest Territories has seen an abundance of thick smoke around Great Slave Lake. It is haltingly awesome how much territory it has covered.

    Monday (Aug 4, 2014, 8:00 PDT), it is PREDICTED that there will be a huge "front" of thick smoke (~25% (Wild Ass Guess) being >300micrograms/m3), like a weather front, from Great Bear Lake to Lake Winnipeg for most of the afternoon.
    via: http://www.bcairquality.ca/bluesky/west/index.html

    Previously, i witnessed such thick plumes move North/Easterly from around Great Slave Lake.
    Hoping not a lot is accumulating on Greenland ice.
    After all, most of it will likely fall out somewhere.

    Are we witnessing another pathway towards ocean acidification ("nukular" stupidity in JA (& elsewhere) being a multiplicative pathway, if i have that correct).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OT Query (no answer required): Was the "black substance" an example of another type of superaggregate? :/

      Delete
  10. Quote of anne: "The terrible storms and drought and floods caused by Krypton-85 are no hoax. Nor is the acidification of the ocean caused by nuclear waste and radioactive fallout."

    http://enenews.com/lab-director-radiation-spikes-expected-nuclear-facility-govt-pays-air-monitors-impact-populated-areas-doe-ignitability-368-containers-wipp-underground-significant-fire-risk-top-official-mater/comment-page-1#comment-559071

    ...

    “…Arctic sea ice extent declined at a typical rate through May, but extent remained below average for the period of satellite observations. While Antarctic sea ice extent increased at a near average rate, extent was at a record high, and above average in nearly every Antarctic sea ice sector.
    “Arctic sea ice extent for May averaged 12.78 million square kilometers (4.93 million square miles). This is 610,000 square kilometers (235,500 square miles) below the 1981 to 2010 average for the month. May 2014 is now the third lowest May extent in the satellite record. …”
    http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/arctic-sea-ice-melted-normally-in-may-while-antarctic-set-record.html

    Arctic Sea is where so much nuclear waste has been dumped."

    Nobody seems concerned about Xenated compounds either, sadly.
    All of the original 131I released at Fukuppy-Daichi is now 131Xe, for instance.
    http://periodictable.com/Isotopes/053.131/index2.html

    {Where are current 131I detections in sludge from Tokyo & other Prefectures coming from?
    If only we had another Iodine isotope detection to compare ratios to confirm &/or rule out RAI patients. Here is a link to where i see some discussion concerning 131I/132I/133I --> http://enenews.com/tv-mounds-of-millions-of-jellyfish-like-creatures-wash-up-on-pacific-beaches-across-multiple-states-they-lined-entire-oregon-coast-seen-for-first-time-in-a-great-many-years-official/comment-page-1#comment-557046 }

    There's a lovely compound formed with Ozone, for instance, though have no knowledge of conditions required for formation nor it's prevalence.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenon_trioxide

    Quote: "Xenon difluoride can be produced by the simple exposure of Xe and F2 gases to sunlight; while the mixing of the two gases had been tried over 50 years before in an attempt to produce a reaction, nobody had thought to simply expose the mixture to sunlight."
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_gas_compound#Xenon_compounds

    (WTF is "Therapeutic" Sodium Iodide 131I ??? !!! Is it approved by the late Dr. Kevorkian?)

    ReplyDelete
  11. You have made a case for damage due to radiation contamination, but you still have not made a case that global warming does not exist. There are a variety of converging forces that are contributing to the degradation of the earth. Currently the residents of Toledo, Ohio cannot drink their water due to algae bloom caused by agricultural / chemical runoff.
    By denying global warming, and by casting most scientists as "Eggheads" you are reducing your credibility and isolating yourself.
    I think that many of the solutions you offer share common ground with those offered by people concerned with global warming. If people of opposing points of view would realize that they actually share common ground instead of arguing about the points upon which they disagree, much progress could be made in combatting the damage to the earth and the environment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HIlarious, you state that Nukepro has not made a case that global warming does not exist. Wow, do you even bother to review the top chart? A seventh grader could tell you that we are not warming for the last 17 years.

      More radical weather and a cooling trend are what we are faced with.

      The sun is the main driver here.

      Delete
    2. Stock - The top graph shows a simple step up to where we are, and yeah, as we load the atmosphere, the earth can absorb so much until we exceed it ability then we go up again, that's what the graph tells me. Simply because we are at the highest 'step' on the graph and we haven't went up for a few years does not mean it's no happening. Sorry.

      Delete
    3. @Anon, get an account please. Do you think the Chinese industrialisation has contributed no pollution and CO2? So you think that is "why" we stalled out? No go. There is NO correlation between CO2 and temp. there are massive correlation between sun activity and temp.

      Man is not at the center of the universe. Man is not all important. The other planets are also seeing massive changes, Jupiter lost a large spot for one example.

      Ego is a deadly sin. Turning matter into energy is not Godlike, is it crime of ego. stock out.

      Delete
  12. Memo to Jimmy Conca:

    If you like your radiation care plan, you can keep it! :P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL, I did ask Conca what his regimen was for increased radiation intake to promote whoremesis.....

      his answer "of course I don't try to take more radiation"

      heretic! LOL

      Delete
  13. Unfortunately for us all (imho), there does appear a window of opportunity for 'warmers to beat their warming drums, and that is because of possible impending Northern Greenland glacial retreat.

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/greenland-s-dark-snow-climate-threat-worse-than-thought-1.2776628

    Funny they mentioned dung, as i wonder where all that shite came from.

    Had also wondered where all that wildfire smoke went from the Yellowknife region.
    Don't know what that bodes for wildlife, but I sense it doesn't bode well.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Quote of jsam: "The earth is losing a trillion tons of ice per year:

    - 159 Gt Antarctic land ice, McMillan el al, GRL (2014)
    + 26 Gt Antarctic sea ice, Holland et al, J Climate (2014)
    - 261 Gt Arctic sea ice, PIOMAS
    - 378 Gt Greenland, Enderlin et al, GRL (2014)
    - 259 Gt other land based glaciers, Gardner et al. Science (2013)

    - 1,031 Gt, total

    Deniers can find the 2% growth and miss the 98% shrinkage."
    http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2014/10/09/we_have_more_to_learn_says_scientist_antarctic_sea_ice_at_all_time_record/#c_2324060

    I don't know if this is true. Is this true?

    Quote: "Burned and blasted craters, along with piles of scorched dust cover almost an entire hemisphere of Mars. Gigantic trenches across its scarred face could indicate that lightning thousands or millions of times more energetic than we know today devastated Mars."
    https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2011/10/12/nuclear-war-god/

    Haven't read this yet, but it has stimulated an induced current of interest in my mind.

    "The Essential Guide to the Electric Universe (EG2EU)"
    https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2011/08/18/10609/

    This goes hand in hand, if i have that correctly. :)
    http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/education/tutorials/java/handrules/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is the Helix Nebula (picture linked below) a similar system to the one pictured on the top of the Guide to the Electric Universe, though from a different angle?
      http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap141012.html

      Delete
  15. OK. So; here we are. There is no net global temperature increase in the last 17+ years.

    How are we doing for temperature differentials in certain critical regions/water bodies?
    I see three hurricanes roaring now on RSOE EDIS, one of which is heading for Hawaii. There were several tropical storms or greater not that long ago from the global view.

    What is up with that Typhoon that seems to have parked itself off the Eastern coast of India, for instance? ref: http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/site/index.php?pageid=event_summary&edis_code=TC-20141012-45603-IND

    Is the coming rising Eastern Pacific heating enough to make Hurricane/Typhoons possible further up the West Coast of N/A?

    ReplyDelete
  16. The question i pose, if & when you have time for it is "are air &/or water masses becoming more polarized?"

    (four hurricanes/cyclones/typhoons yesterday, i had it wrong previously - along with the cyclone which was NOT parked off of India)

    Wind looking more "loopy", especially around DC, if i have that correct.
    http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/isobaric/500hPa/orthographic=-71.64,79.91,283
    http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/orthographic=-71.64,79.91,283

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Dud, not sure if it is becoming more polarized or is mostly a matter of tiem and again ocean temp patterns. This guy has contributed at Nukepro and takes the statistics to a higher level, maybe good starting point for ocean cycle knowledge base.

      http://climatechange90.blogspot.com/2013/05/natural-climate-change-has-been.html

      Delete
    2. Domo arigato. Sakeido Hantai!

      Also, shrinking heliosphere due to weakening solar magnetism (?) and weakening Earth magnetosphere allow more cosmic radiation to create clouds, iirc. What that does to Kr or Xe (etc) in lower atmosphere (along with lightning, perhaps), i can only imagine.

      Delete
    3. Excellent article. He seems to have the basic formula nailed.

      Once one gets beyond the doubters in the comments, there is some good info.

      Quote of Norpang: "Dan I think the neutron count is probably the best proxy for solar "activity" Would it be possible for you to download and integrate say the oulu monthly neutron count.
      http://cosmicrays.oulu.fi/
      There is likely a +/-12 year lag between the count lows ( = sunspot highs so you have to invert the curve.)It looks to me e,g that the count low for cycle 22 = the temperature peak about 2003/4
      You might also like to check various posts on my blog
      http://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com
      I forecast cooling which might well match your projections Best Regards Norman Page."

      Quote of Dan Pangburn: "Cosmic rays may well be involved. Svensmark found a correlation between cosmic rays and low altitude clouds. I found that average global temperature is very sensitive to the amount of low altitude clouds in http://lowaltitudeclouds.blogspot.com/ "
      http://climatechange90.blogspot.com/2013/05/natural-climate-change-has-been.html?showComment=1372021995805#c133537871465103687

      Quote of emsnews: " I am Elaine Meinel Supkis,

      daughter of well-known astronomer, Dr. Aden Meinel. I was raised on top of various mountain observatories and played, as a child, in the Solar Observatory on Kitt Peak.

      My grandfather, Edison Petitt, along with his neighbor and friend, Dr. Hubbel, studied the sun very closely since 1915 and my father, all his life, too.

      The facts uncovered by these observations, examination of the Ice Age cycles and satellites studying the sun, led my father to write his last paper before dying last year. It was called 'The Sun Is A Variable Star'.

      In it, he explained how he detected a drop in solar activity. What he used to call, when I was a child, 'The long walk to the surface of the sun' whereby the molecular fires move from deep within to the surface before ejecting into space...this activity suddenly fell off greatly!

      That is, the sun showed deep interior signs of shutting down the level of activity and this would be confirmed by two things: the sudden end to sun spot activity and the 'dark regions' of the sun which emit 'solar wind' would grow greatly in size.

      Which is exactly what is happening now. Instead of reaching a solar peak, we suddenly have hardly any sun spots and sometimes even half of the sun (to my great shock) is 'dark'.

      Literally dark!

      Nature magazine which had published my father in the past refused to publish this, his crowning achievement. They said on the phone, 'No one wants to hear this. It is too incredible. If it is true, we should all commit suicide'.

      My grandfather talked a lot about the Ice Ages. He impressed on me the urgency of understanding what caused it. 'It had to be the sun,' he said often. 'It is the main source of energy and like any star, can be quite fickle'.

      I see from the comments by Chris Crawford, the global warming people utterly disregard sun spot activity as any indicator of warming or cooling. They simply wiped out ALL the research done by my father, grandfather, Hubble...sheesh.

      Nothing makes me madder. This is OUTRAGEOUS. These fiends even tried to eliminate the Little Ice Age which is now called the Maunder Minimum. Only this year, did these vandals admit it was cooler then...only to then turn around and say, 'But not EVERYWHERE.'

      The Ice Ages didn't hit the Southern Hemisphere even remotely as hard as the Northern Hemisphere. Even more interesting is the fact that Siberia and Alaska had less ice than Europe or the Midwest while the Northeastern half of the North American continent was under a mile of ice!

      This uneven cooling is similar to uneven warming. By the way, it nearly froze last night on my mountain in NY. First week of September and no major volcanic eruption! It was just plain cold!

      Delete
    4. The latest scam is the claim made this week that the cold is caused by the ocean soaking up the sun's heat. This is silly beyond words. These same people claimed we would see more el Nino events.

      Instead, la Nina has sat in the Pacific for several years now with no sign of departing. They also predicted more and more hurricanes. Zero this year so far! Utterly devastated the official predictions of at least 12.

      Where are these hurricanes? What prevents them? Hurricanes grow in warm water so why isn't the water off of Africa and in the Caribbean warm enough? While supposedly soaking up all that sun with no sun spots?

      So, they claim now that global warming will NOT have hurricanes and big storms! And I suppose, will cause early freezes, too. As well as more blizzards and bigger glaciers. This isn't science, this is childish.

      The true nature of science is to be able to ACCURATELY PREDICT THE FUTURE. If the models don't match reality, they, not reality, must fall. I see virtually no accuracy in global warming model predictions so long as they leave out the sun spot element. And I hope they figure this out before they are eaten by polar bears roaming London and Virginia."

      http://climatechange90.blogspot.com/2013/05/natural-climate-change-has-been.html?showComment=1378528642335#c210666726430881181

      Delete
  17. Quote of " Anonymous Coward": "The discovery this week of axions (ie dark matter) from the stellar core?

    New particle, barely interacts with matter but more so than neutrinos, decays by emitting photons." [purportedly x-rays] "

    Could be responsible for the radioactive seasonal decay anomaly and possibly contribute to noise in superconductors."

    http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2014/10/18/nasa_spies_solar_heat_bombs_mini_tornadoes_and_nanoflares_on_sun/

    http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/iris-helps-explain-heating-of-solar-atmosphere/

    http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml

    Quote: "Possible 2014 detection

    Axions may have been detected through irregularities in X-ray emission due to interaction of the Earth's magnetic field with radiation streaming from the Sun. Studying 15 years of detection data produced by the European Space Agency's XMM-Newton observatory, a research group at Leicester University noticed a seasonal variation for which no conventional explanation could be found. One potential explanation for the variation, described as "plausible" by the senior author of the paper that reported the team's findings, was X-rays produced by interaction of Axions produced at the Sun's core with the Earth's magnetic field.[26]"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

    Quote: "With this disclaimer, they look at the amount of X-rays with energies between 0.2 and 10keV and notice that the flux has a rather clear seasonal dependence. The significance of these effects is claimed to be 4, 5, and 11 sigma (!!!)"

    http://motls.blogspot.ca/2014/10/an-overlooked-paper-discovering-axions.html

    Quote: "The reality is that there's been no positive trend in the global mean temperature for 18 years "

    http://motls.blogspot.ca/2014/09/antarctica-is-climate-denier-too.html

    Quote: "Oh, the CO2 concentration is so high! It's a signal from the heaven, a shot from the Aurora telling us to start another world revolution because our previous one, that of 1917, has already faded away and it wasn't enough for us, anyway. The number is so round, and so on. Of course, nothing new happens when the CO2 level reaches 400 ppm – it's just another number that only looks special because of an arbitrary decadic numeral system we happen to use today. The Earth has seen concentrations around 6,000 ppm as well and 4,000 ppm would be just fine for all life forms we know today. By far the closest worrisome CO2 concentration is 150 ppm in which most existing plant species stop growing (ice ages have only forced them to easily withstand 180 ppm or so)."

    http://motls.blogspot.ca/2014/09/one-half-of-co2-doubling-achieved.html

    That would be MBP, the anarchist & future chicken-hawk, leading the "revolutionary" charge, i'd wager.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Quote: "The empirical data make it clear that there can't be a predictable yet high global warming. Either the CO2-induced warming is predictable, in which case the negligible increase before 2014 must be a good estimate; or the CO2-induced warming is high in which case one needs other, equally large factors that were canceling it, and the future is unpredictable because of these factors!"

    http://motls.blogspot.ca/2014/09/one-half-of-co2-doubling-achieved.html

    ReplyDelete
  19. Quote: "April 16, 2014: Earth's poles are separated by four oceans, six continents and more than 12,000 nautical miles.

    Turns out, that's not so far apart.

    New data from NASA's AIM spacecraft have revealed "teleconnections" in Earth's atmosphere that stretch all the way from the North Pole to the South Pole and back again, linking weather and climate more closely than simple geography would suggest. "

    http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/16apr_teleconnections/

    " "We picked Indianapolis as an example, because I have family living there," says Randall, "but the same was true of many northern cities: cold air temperatures on the ground were correlated with NLC frequencies high above Antarctica two weeks later," she says.

    The two week delay is, apparently, how much time it takes for the teleconnection signal to propagate through three layers of atmosphere (the troposphere, stratosphere and mesosphere), and from pole to pole."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does the former help explain some strange radiation readings in Australia &/or New Zealand in relation to Fukushima Daiichi ongoing "nukular" disaster?

      Delete
  20. In regards to calculations and formulae by Dan Pangburn @ http://climatechange90.blogspot.ca/2013/05/natural-climate-change-has-been.html

    One sentence from the following "article" caught my eye, regarding anticipated greater cosmic ray penetration into the inner Sol system in years to come.

    I hope it can serve to refine predictions.

    Quote: "The time to 3 per cent REID is estimated to be ~20 per cent lower in the coming cycle 24–25 minimum."
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/22/the_sun_has_changed_in_a_way_weve_never_seen_mars_trips_may_be_off/

    Would that be somewhere in between "assuming sunspots like from 1925 to 1941 or for the case of no sunspots"?

    Note how they say "nukular" is the only thing that could supposedly save us.
    The Rosetta satellite proves otherwise with it's new panels that harvest light at a distance where only 4% the intensity of Earth-bound sunlight is available!

    Quote: ""The solar cells in Rosetta's solar panels are based on a completely new technology, so-called Low-intensity Low Temperature Cells. Thanks to them, Rosetta is the first space mission to journey beyond the main asteroid belt relying solely on solar cells for power generation.

    "Previous deep-space missions used nuclear RTGs, radioisotope thermal generators. The new solar cells allow Rosetta to operate over 800 million kilometres from the Sun, where levels of sunlight are only 4% those on Earth. The technology will be available for future deep-space, such as ESA's upcoming Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer.""
    http://www.theecologist.org/blogs_and_comments/commentators/2503653/rosetta_shows_we_can_keep_space_plutoniumfree.html (also available on Enformable site)

    There is also has some brief info on SNAP-9A/Cosmos-954 238Pu incidents. An article from another site gives me a new lie for your list. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. dud(e) don't hold back on the lies, lay them out, lol

      Delete

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments